In larger, multi-swtich systems, a Cisco Catalyst is a better choice. Testing has shown the SG350 is appropriate in a single switch system or smaller systems of, say, three or four studios. Given the relative cost savings between the Catalyst and the SG line, each user will need to balance their own risk vs. All tests performed well, except for the noted outages. We tested this switch for use with Axia Power Station, QOR console, iQx Console, and xSwitch with other Axia gear. We observed interruptions of thirty seconds to a minute however, the switch ALWAYS recovered. For that reason, it is best to carefully plan for making any changes to this switch while it's in use. A couple of general comments about this series of switches: Unlike its big brother in the Catalyst line of Cisco switches, some portions of this configuration caused audio to be briefly interrupted.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |